2021 NBA Draft Coverage: Quentin Grimes
Quentin Grimes is a high-risk, high-reward prospect in this year’s draft. A McDonald’s All-American and MVP and gold medalist at the 2018 FIBA Americas U18 tournament out of high school, Grimes was to be a potential among the Top 5 picks in the 2019 NBA Draft, one and made in Kansas under Bill Self. However, he appeared to lose his mojo, averaging just 8.4 points, 2.5 rebounds, and 2.0 assists per game and shooting 38.4% from the floor (60.3% from the line). , taking a backseat with upper class students Dedrick Lawson and LaGerald Vick. With Grimes exploring entry into the project but ultimately refusing it, Self had already filled his scholarship spot, so Grimes was allowed to immediately transfer home to the University of Houston. He would redevelop his game over his two years there and quietly lead them to Final 4 of the 2021 March Madness Series. As he began the 2021 draft process midway through the second round, Grimes soared through the ranks. charts until the end of the first due to his excellent performance at the draft combine, where his defense and underrated passing ability were highlighted.
Per game: 17.8 points, 5.7 rebounds, 2.0 assists, 1.4 steals, 0.3 blocks, 40.6% FG, 40.3% 3PT, 78.8% FT
Advanced: 55.8% True Shooting, 10.8 BPM (7.9 offensive, 2.9 defensive), 0.250 winning shares per 40
Physical: 21 years old (he will be 22 next May), 6’5 “with a wingspan of 6’8” and a standing reach of 8’5 “, 205 pounds
Grimes’ greatest strength in college was his long-range shooting, reaching 40% at high volume – one of only 3 DI players to make 100 attempts or more (he hit exactly 100). Not only was he a stable threat when caught, but he showed good ability to hit 3 seconds on screens, movement and bounce, as well as at a very deep distance, showing tremendous improvement throughout. of his years at university.
Grimes was also his team’s second-best rebounder at 5.7 per game, something Houston coach Kelvin Sampson insisted he work on during his time in Houston, a marked improvement over his lackluster 2, 5 in minutes similar to Kansas. It’s worth noting that 1.6 of these were from the offensive glass crash, a big part of the Houston system (they had 7 players averaging 1 or more per game), so it’s clear that Grimes really bought.
Of note, Grimes was one of two players last year with a top ten offensive (# 9, 3.7) and defensive (# 5, 2.4), the other being Evan Mobley (# 5 , 4.3 and # 2, 2.6, respectively). In some research, I have generally found that NCAA players who rank in the top ten in terms of defensive win shares or defensive box plus / minus, especially those shooting above 40% of three. , more often than not become important players in the NBA. Grimes was arguably Houston’s best defenseman and often took the toughest wing or guard game. One thing that particularly stands out in the game movie is its ability to fly and even block jump shots without committing too many fouls.
Grimes’ biggest weakness was his general inability to finish on two-point ground, shooting just 40.8% over 2s. Now part of that was probably because he was guarded by the best wing of the opposing teams, but that’s a big red flag. To me there are two main reasons for this – he doesn’t seem to be able to generate a lot of top-to-bottom or left-to-right separation, and doesn’t touch him to get floats, runners, and layouts. -ups at different angles, even former NCAA players. This notably causes him to rely on a lot of shots in traffic, with his legs a lot more forward than his shoulders and his arms pulling the ball, giving the impression of not being explosive enough (in reality, he has tested a 38.5 ” maximum vertical jump at the combine). This resulted in him taking a lot more 2 longs than he should have, settling for midrange floats and heavily contested long jumpers instead of going to the rack. Plus, his ball control has never been the safest, with a 1-to-1 spin rate for this college career, especially when going left. And, unfortunately, one of his favorite moves was a reluctance to drive on the left for a float, which may have worked in high school but went about as well as expected given the previous discussion. on its weaknesses.
While Grimes didn’t show a great ability to play and pass through in college, he impressed many scouts in combine matches with a more creative edge than expected. or if they had never been there to begin with.
I see Quentin Grimes as shades of Dillon Brooks without as much madness, or maybe Josh Hart without as much strength and inner scoring ability. Grimes’ shooting ability in the pick and roll, especially shooting the three of dribbling, pick and roll, and transfers, would fit well into the Jazz offense. His defense and rebounds would also be a welcome addition to a backcourt that has struggled with both on occasion. But his inability to score from the 3-point line frankly ends his career if he’s unable to figure out his touch around the rim and he continues to settle for midrange rider-runner mashups. I have a feeling his game will translate much better in the NBA, where more space and strength will give him the ability to reach the edge. However, there is a reason why Grimes fell out of the 2019 NBA Draft. I don’t think Grimes would be a bad choice to develop in the long run under the tutelage of Donovan Mitchell, Jordan Clarkson and Joe Ingles, but I do think. that the Jazz would be better served by meeting a greater need for large 3, 4s and five small ball guard.